临床数据质量评估指标研究(5)
5 结语
本研究通过对质量评估相关文献和实际数据问题中相关知识进行收集、分解、合并与归纳,基于当前关注度较高的质量维度,即完整性、合理性、准确性、一致性、时间性,构建包含43项对数据问题进行唯一表述的评估指标,描述各项指标所适用的评估方式。通过与传统指标以及国家标准的比较,本文所提出的质量评估指标更全面地涵盖国标中的评估需求,更清晰、准确地映射到现有国家质量评估标准。对于临床数据质量评估的标准化有促进意义。本研究也存在一些不足:首先,即使结合文献与实际问题报告总结归纳指标,仍然难以保证指标全面性。收集文献时尽量更多地纳入相关文献,在案例选择上充分考虑典型性,从而最大可能地代表当前实际应用中质量评估的需求。其次,本研究提出的指标需组织专家进行评估和验证,在后续工作中将组织经验丰富的专家对指标进行讨论和完善[12]。
1 Whitelaw F G, Nevin S L, Milne R M. Completeness and Accuracy of Morbidity and Repeat Prescribing Records Held on General Practice Computers in Scotland[J]. The British Journal of General Practice: The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 1996, 46(404): 181-186.
2 彭传薇,刘琛玺,李小华. 浅谈医疗数据质量重要性及其影响[J]. 解放军医院管理杂志, 2005, 12(5): 467-468.
3 Amber Lee Dennis. Case Study: using data quality and data management to improve patient care - DATAVERSITY[EB/OL].[2020-06-25]. net/case-study-using-data-quality-data-management-improve-patient-care/.
4 Makary M A, Daniel M. Medical Error—the third leading cause of death in the US[J]. BMJ, 2016(353):i2139.
5 Maydanchik A. Data Quality Assessment[M]. New Jersey: Technics Publications, 2007: 25-28.
6 Lee K, Weiskopf N, Pathak J. A Framework for Data Quality Assessment in Clinical Research Datasets[C]. Washington DC: Annual Symposium Proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2017: 1080-1089.
7 Weiskopf N G, Weng C. Methods and Dimensions of Electronic Health Record Data Quality Assessment: enabling reuse for clinical research[J]. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2013, 20(1): 144-151.
8 Johnson S G, Speedie S, Simon G. A Data Quality Ontology for the Secondary Use of EHR Data[C]. San Francisco: Annual Symposium Proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2015: 1937-1946.
9 Kahn M G, Callahan T J, Barnard J. A Harmonized Data Quality Assessment Terminology and Framework for the Secondary Use of Electronic Health Record Data[J]. eGEMs (Generating Evidence & Methods to Improve Patient Outcomes), 2016, 4(1): 18.
10 Chen H, Hailey D, Wang N. A Review of Data Quality Assessment Methods for Public Health Information Systems[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2014, 11(5): 5170-5207.
11 Reimer A P, Milinovich A, Madigan E A. Data Quality Assessment Framework to Assess Electronic Medical Record Data for Use in Research[J]. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 2016(90): 40-47.
12 Mccormack J L, Ash J S. Clinician Perspectives on the Quality of Patient Data Used for Clinical Decision Support: a qualitative study[C]. Chicago: Annual Symposium Proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2012: 1302-1309.
13 Taggart J, Liaw S-T, Yu H. Structured Data Quality Reports to Improve EHR Data Quality[J]. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 2015, 84(12): 1094-1098.
14 Zhang R, Wang Y, Liu B. Clinical Data Quality Problems and Countermeasure for Real World Study[J]. Frontiers of Medicine, 2014, 8(3): 352-357.
15 Liaw S-T, Taggart J, Dennis S. Data Quality and Fitness for Purpose of Routinely Collected Data--a General Practice Case Study from an Electronic Practice-based Research Network (EPBRN)[C]. Washington DC: Annual Symposium Proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2011: 785-794.
16 Logan J R, Gorman P N, Middleton B. Measuring the Quality of Medical Records: a method for comparing completeness and correctness of clinical encounter data[C]. Washington DC: Proceedings of AMIA Symposium, 2001: 408-412.
17 Ali S M, Anjum N, Kamel Boulos M N. Measuring Management’s Perspective of Data Quality in Pakistan’s Tuberculosis Control Programme: a test-based approach to identify data quality dimensions[J]. BMC Research Notes, 2018, 11(1): 40.
18 Weiskopf N G, Bakken S, Hripcsak G. A Data Quality Assessment Guideline for Electronic Health Record Data Reuse[J]. eGEMs (Generating Evidence & Methods to Improve Patient Outcomes), 2017, 5(1): 14.
19 Khare R, Utidjian L, Ruth B J. A Longitudinal Analysis of Data Quality in a Large Pediatric Data Research Network[J]. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2017, 24(6): 1072-1079.
20 Diazvasquez J F. DataGauge: a model-driven framework for systematically assessing the quality of clinical data for secondary use(2016)[EB/OL].[2020-10-14].
21 Canadian Institute for Health Information. CIHI’s Information Quality Framework | CIHI[EB/OL].[2020-06-05].
文章来源:《冶金自动化》 网址: http://www.yjzdhzz.cn/qikandaodu/2021/0502/468.html